Independent Commission for Equity in Cricket’s (ICEC) Call for Written Evidence

Task 

As part of their evidence gathering process, the ICEC ran a Call for Written Evidence in response to specific questions relating to equity in cricket, with a focus on race, gender, and class. A total of 96 responses to the Call for Evidence were received via an online survey or by email. Responses came from a range of organisations and academics, as well as individuals who provided feedback reflecting their personal views and experiences. TONIC were asked to analyse the written responses to this Call for Evidence and produce a summary report, identifying key themes.  

Our Approach 

TONIC conducted thematic analysis on all of the open questions – under each of the five themes of interest addressed by the consultation. Quotations were taken from responses and used throughout the summary report to illustrate the findings.  

Outcome 

TONIC produced a detailed report that summarised the findings from the qualitative analysis, structured under the following five  themes of interest:  

  1. Talent Pathway and Progression into professional cricket 

  2. Culture 

  3. Good Practice 

  4. Complaints and Discipline (discrimination-related) 

  5. Governance and Leadership. 

The findings highlighted evidence of significant gaps in equitable access and progression from the grassroots game up to the elite game for individuals attending state schools, when compared to private schools; those from ethnic minorities, when compared to white players; and for women and girls, compared to boys and men. 

Some of the key findings revealed:  

  • Racism is entrenched in cricket 

  • Women are marginalised and routinely experience sexism and misogyny in cricket 

  • There is little-to-no focus on addressing class barriers in cricket 

  • The cricket complaints system is confusing, overly defensive, and not fit for purpose 

  • The procedures in place to ensure equality, diversity, and inclusion require significant improvement.  

In response to the Call for Written Evidence, the ICEC set out 44 recommendations to transform the game’s culture and, in some cases, to redesign the systems that govern and operate cricket. As an essential first step, the ICEC recommended the England Cricket Board makes an unqualified public apology for its own failings and those of the game it governs.